Dear Bh. Mark Prabhu, Please accept my humble obeisances!
All Glories to Srila Prabhupada!
It is nice to hear from you and see that you have interest
in understanding legal/corporate documents and in ISKCON, Inc. Perhaps it would
be good idea Prabhu if before trying to appear like an expert, you would have
made a study of the basic legal corporate documents related to ISKCON, Inc. and
what is the basis of the above written and proposed. I do not want to make you
embrassed by citing ALL the many factually wrong statements and inferences you
have promulgated. But a couple I will show below so that you can begin to
understand.
You write to say that
"The most crucial misunderstanding is found in
Paragraph 3, where the unknown author states…
“The ISKCON, Inc. society or Long
Island temple…”
Here he erroneously equates Iskcon
Inc. with the Long Island temple. As I pointed out in my post (#2) above, this
is a pure concoction. Iskcon Inc. was originally “associated” with a different
temple in NY and ONLY for the purposes of having a physical address on the Societies’
Incorporation registration form."
The "OR" between ISKCON, Inc. society and Long
Island temple is not meant to equate the two, but they are taken as EITHER OR
i.e in essence, if anyone fears either
ISKCON, Inc. OR Long island temple (which is a separate entity but as many
devotees generally do not differentiate between the two, one may think Long
Island temple may try to overlord over other temples, as was proposed by
Karandhara in 1970s for LA temple, if not the ISKCON, Inc.). Both scenarios are being rejected by this
statement. Not that the statement wants to show ISKCON, Inc and LI temple are
one and the same. If you would have cared to read the current Certificate of
Incorporation of ISKCON, Inc. you would have seen the difference CLEARLY and
then VERY CLEARLY set about. Section 16(d) clearly states:
"The Trustees and Officers of ISKCON, Inc. have
jurisdiction only over the principal place of worship. [i.e. currently LI
temple]. The rules governing this control are laid out in the Bylaws of the
corporation. Apart from that, the trustees or officers cannot interfere in any
administrative or financial matters of the temples maintained by a Branch. They
have no jurisdiction over the branches. ..."
Therefore the rest of your exposition seems to go in a wrong
direction --- "As I proceed, you will come to understand how terribly
crucial this wrong assumption actually is."
” They only
voluntarily affiliate to ISKCON, Inc. by a resolution passed by them”
This is
completely wrong. Each temple or preaching center was absolutely beholden to
the rules of ISKCON (aka Iskcon Inc.) Srila Prabhupada never wanted anyone to
start their own society with its own rules. “
You are correct to say that all
the independent societies were to form by the same rules as of ISKCON, Inc., not by their own rules. That is
what we have implemented in ISKCON, Inc. and have advised all affiliates to
incorporate. Again, if you would have cared to read the current certificate of
Incorporation of ISKCON, Inc. which has been sent to all affiliates, and
publicly posted many places, then you would not be making these comments:“Any organization, whether or not named ISKCON, Inc. or not, whether in the state of NY, outside of USA or in any other country of the world, who wish to be AFFILIATED with ISKCON, Inc., may do so by adopting or amending their certificate of Incorporation (or equal document) to be made to be the same as the Certificate of Incorporation of ISKCON, Inc. , NY., including this certificate of Amendment – adapting it to the local laws. (Ref Annexure G—letter to Mukunda from Srila Prabhupada instructing this procedure for establishing ISKCON Ltd in London). These organizations will be known as Affiliates.”.. (Section 16(c))
They were to be independent, yet following the same rules as ISKCON, Inc. otherwise they cannot be considered to be part of worldwide ISKCON. It is a voluntary decision. As far as our information goes, Srila Prabhupada never legally enforced the voluntary desire on the part of a local organization to part of or go away from “ISKCON”. If you find any example that he did, I would like to know. Based on this understanding, the above has been conceived.
In the end, we would request all respected Vaisnavas that it
may better serve our Spiritual Master's mission to work on a solid basic plan
to cooperate, a solution to the continued infighting, i.e. to discuss AND POINT
OUT DEFICIENCIES, FOR THE PURPOSE OF HARBORING BETTER COOPERATION, GIVING
SOLUTIONS, rather then the excruciating habit plaguing the Prabhupadanugas to
try to bring down every sincere attempt to bring about cooperation. Let us go
forward being discriminatory, but let us come up with positive
suggestion/solutions that would really work to bring about cooperation in the
Prabhupadanugas World.
This mood would be reflected in the above critique if the critique
had found AT LEAST 1 GOOD POINT, 1 GOOD ATTEMPT TO SERVE SRILA PRABHUPADA.
Personally when I read any critique, which does not point
good and bad points together in a balanced objective manner, I would normally
look at the critique to see if I missed something, but do not usually take the
author too seriously as he appears to be biased by some other motive, there can
be many- to show feeling of importance, to want attention, to prove oneself
better then everyone else, wanting others to listen to him only, dahdadah….etc.
Mark Prabhu, I would humble suggest that, with all your good
qualities and intelligence, good heart to serve Srila Prabhupada, this could be
a quality which could have prompted devotees at the LI Temple to let you go
within 1-2 months of being there. I was not there at the time, but did speak to
you a couple of times from India and this was my impression too.
If you like, Gaurangasundar prabhu can send you all the
corporate documents of which you can make a thorough study. Then if you have
some questions, pls make a list and send me and I will be glad to answer them
on any public forum. Then after that, if you have any suggestion or correction
and it is supported by majority of the Prabhus worldwide then we will
incorporate it likewise in whichever corporate document or Constitution. WE
WANT TO BE DECENTRALIZED as Srila Prabhupada desires and as this is the only
way to train Brahmanas. If there is any mistake in our direction, we would
respectfully take all corrections to better serve this aim.
Ys
Nimai Pandit Das
President
ISKCON, Inc.
No comments:
Post a Comment