By Narasimha das
“It is said that one result is achieved by worshiping the Supreme Cause
of all causes, and that another is obtained by worshiping what is not supreme.
All this was heard from the undisturbed authorities who clearly explained it.”
(Sri Isopanisad, Mantra Thirteen) In
his purport to this verse, Srila Prabhupada explains, “Unless one hears from the bona fide acarya, who is never disturbed by the changes of the material
world, one cannot have the real key to transcendental knowledge.”Itishushrumadhiranam, ye nas tad
vicacaksire.
Devotees who have traveled and
preached in India can easily understand what Srila Prabhupada identified as the
main problem with modern India:“In
modern times the numbers of such pretenders has increased in considerable
numbers, and it has become a problem for the pure devotees of the Lord to save
the mass of people from the unholy propaganda of these pretenders and imitation
incarnations of God.”(Sri Isopanisad,
Mantra 13, Purport) Although people in India have natural devotion to the
Supreme Lord and His great devotees, such as Lakshmi, Hanuman and Garuda, most
are confused or ignorant about the conclusions of the scriptures and thus
sometimes get misled into ”worshipingwhat
is not supreme.” This is because they hear from bogus preachers rather than
the pure devotees of the Lord.Thus they are unable to distinguish between
matter and spirit.
“Presently people are so fallen that they cannot distinguish between a
conditioned soul and a liberated soul.” (SB. 4.18.5, Purport)
“If one tries to mingle the worship of yogamaya and mahamaya, considering
them one and the same, he does not really show very high intelligence.” (Caitanya-Caritamrta, Madhya 8.90, Purport)
Monkey Worshipers and Hanuman Offenders
I am presently residing atSri Kishkindya
Kshetra, the birthplace of the pure devotee avatar Sri Hanumanji.In a few days
from now, a half million people will converge on the nearby tiny village of
Hampi for Hanuman Jayanti. Many of the pilgrims, local tour guides and
residents here refer to Hanuman’s divine birthplace as “The Monkey Temple.” In
fact, all over India, Hanuman is referred to as “the monkey god.” At the same
time, here, and at other places in South India, monkeysare worshiped as
Hanuman. Peoplefeed them all kinds of sweets and junk food. This causes them tobecome
deranged and destructive; they constantly create havoc in the temples and
villages. At remote small farms they often destroy entire crops of coconuts and
bananas for sport. Nonetheless, they are not only tolerated butfreely fed and adored
by foolish, misguided persons who consider themexpansions of Hanuman. (According
to modern Indian law it is illegal for a farmer to kill a single monkey to
protect his livelihood, yet it is perfectly legal for big businessmen to export
millions of cows for slaughter.)
The other day, while I was
walking into the Virupakshatemple (at Hampi) with a bunch of ripe bananas to
offer to Lord Shiva, I was attacked by three large languor monkeys,
commonlyknown as “Hanuman monkeys.”Fortunately I had my umbrella and wasable to
fight them off. Seeing the fray, some pilgrims protested, shouting, “No, no,
give them the bananas. They are Hunuman!” I exclaimed, “Monkeys are animals!
Hanuman is a devata!”
Actually Hanuman is much more
than an ordinarydevata; he is a great
devotee of the Supreme Personality of Godhead. It is offensive to consider
Hanuman a monkey or to consider monkeys to be Sri Hunuman-ji.Similarly,it’s offensive
to worship a demigod as God or to consider the Supreme Lorda demigod. Such
worshipers are condemned in the Bhagavad-gita
and in Sri Isopanisad. “Those who are engaged in the worship of
demigods enter into the darkest regions of ignorance, and still more so do the
worshipers of the Absolute.” (Sri
Isopanisad, Mantra 12) Persons who consider the bona fide spiritual master
an ordinary man and persons whoworship a pretentiousupstartas the spiritual
master are on the same dangerous path. All such foolish mistakes are avoided by
understanding the difference between matter and spirit. Proper discrimination
is achieved by hearing from “theundisturbed
authorities who clearly explained it.”Itishushrumadhiranam,
ye nas tad vicacaksire.
Vaikuntha Avatars
Queen Kunti Devi prayed to Lord Krishna,
expressing her feelings thatHis pastimes as a human being weresometimesbewildering. Although she was fully aware that Krishna was
the Supreme Personality of Godhead, she expressed wonderment at howHe seemed to
act exactly like an ordinary human being inmany ways. For instance, He seemed
take birth from the womb of Devaki. He would offer Kunti Devi and other
so-called superiorsHis humble obeisance. He once cried in lamentation when the
mystic demon Shalva presented an illusion before Him wherein Shalva appeared to
be beheading Krishna’s father, Vasudeva. As a child, He cried when Mother
Yasoda chased Him with a whipping switch. Srila Prabhupada comments in this
regard that when Lord Krishna plays a role, He does it perfectly. Sri Chaitanya
Mahaprabhu played this “human” role more completely than any other avatar of
Godby following strictly the rules and regulations of varnashrama-dharma. Similarly, the eternally liberated spiritual
masterplays the role of an ordinary human being for the benefit of all living
entities, to show everyone how to become a pure devotee. And he does it
perfectly.
“A nitya-siddha devotee comes
from Vaikuntha upon the order of the Supreme Personality of Godhead and shows
by his personal example how to become a pure devotee. (anyabhilasita-sunyam…) A pure devotee, therefore, is a practical
example for all living entities, including Lord Brahma.” (Srimad-Bhagavatam 7.10.3, Purport)
“The Personality of Godhead, from His Kingdom, sends His bona fide
servants to propagate this mission of going back to Godhead, and sometimes He
comes Himself to do this work.” (Sri
Isopanisad, Mantra 11, Purport)
“Whenever and wherever there is decline in religious practice, O
descendent of Bharata, and a predominant rise of irreligion – at that time I
descend Myself.” (Bg.4.7)
In the case of some pure
devotees, there is another reason they descend: to showsadhakasthe pitfalls on the devotional path, as did the great
devotee Bharata Maharaja, who became a deer in his next life due to becoming
attached to a pet. Sometimes a liberated devotee acts as if he werebewildered
or perplexed. In truth, heallows himself to come under the spell not of mahamaya, or material illusion, but
Krishna’s yoga-maya. Srila Prabhupada mentions that when a pure devotee speaks as
if he were fallen or unqualified, he is not making a show; rather, he truly
feels this way due to deep humility, which
is inspired by the Lord’s internal spiritual potency. Usually when a great
devotee appears to be in illusion or ignorant, it is for the sake of enacting a
pastime of the Supreme Lord. For instance, Arjuna was apparently bewildered on
the battlefield of Kurukshetra before the fight, and this gave rise to the
great lila of Krishna speaking the Bhagavad-gita. Those who have heard about
the transcendentalcharacter of Arjuna from
undisturbedauthorities,knowthere could be no material reason why Arjuna would hesitate to do his duty, especially withKrishna by his side, driving his chariot.
undisturbedauthorities,knowthere could be no material reason why Arjuna would hesitate to do his duty, especially withKrishna by his side, driving his chariot.
“Pilgrims to Hell”
Srila Prabhupada points out that
there is another reason that Krishna sometimes acts like an ordinary human
being. It is to bewilder the envious atheists--to give them full opportunity to
deny God and go to hell. “If a living
being wants to go to hell, the Lord allows him to do so without interference,
and if he wants to go back home, back to Godhead, the Lord also helps him to do
that.” (Sri Isopanisad, Mantra
Eight, Purport) The mission of the Pure Devotee is the same as that of Lord Krishna.
Although he is said to be more merciful than Krishna Himself, his mission is
fundamentally the same.
Duplicitous, mischievous personssometimes
deride the authorized acarya. The
memoirs and writings of such polluted conditioned soulsshould be carefully
avoided by those serious about advancing in Krishna consciousness. To a grossly
conditioned soul, Srila Prabhupada might have sometimes appearedtemperamental, capable
of makingmistakes or ignorant of certain facts, but thoughtful disciples are
not misled by external appearances. Maya
can create any illusion before a conditioned soul. These are tests. Only those
who areknowledgeable andwilling to surrender can understand Sri Guru and Sri
Krishna in truth. Otherwise, if one has some other agenda in the Krishna
consciousness movement, he willlikely make fatal miscalculations regardingSrila
Prabhupada or Lord Krishna Himself.
“If the spiritual master is considered an ordinary man, the disciple
surely loses his chance to advance further.”(Srimad-Bhagavatam5.12.14, Purport)
“Fools deride Me when I descend in the human form. They do not know My
transcendental nature as the Supreme Lord of all that be.” (Bhagavad-gita 9.11)
Why would the self-effulgent pure
devotee hide his true glory from his own disciple? He would not. The sastras, however, are full of stories of
disciples being tested by the guru or maya’s
agents. But a sincere student passes the tests. Duplicitous pretenders fail. They
get weeded out. In spite of their opportunity to associate with Srila
Prabhupada and witness his extraordinary devotional mood and unique
transcendental qualities, some of his so-called originaldisciples have fallen
from the path due to their“envy of the exalted
status of the spiritual master.” Under the tight grip of illusion, they
began thinking, “My guru is a regular guy.
Let me exploit him and his mission for my own sense gratification.”Such mundane
students are quickly ruined. “One should consider the spiritual master
to be as good as the Supreme Personality of Godhead. In spite of all of these
instructions, if one considers the spiritual master an ordinary human being, he
is doomed.”Some so-called disciplesdeliberately conspired to minimize Srila
Prabhupada and remove him as the spiritual master of the Hare Krishna movement.
Their motive?They coveted his post.Srila Prabhupada prophetically warned of
this: “As soon as a foolish disciple
tries to overtake his spiritual master and becomes ambitious to occupy his
post, he immediately falls down.” (Srimad-Bhagavatam
5.12.14, Purport)
Many modernly educated Indians have
concluded thatKrishna’s pastimes on Earth were a myth.Such persons have all been
indoctrinated by Western traditions of atheism and speculation. “Such faithless persons are described in Bhagavad-gita as mudhas, foolish as the ass. It is said that the mudhas deride the Supreme Personality of
Godhead because they don’t have complete knowledge from the undisturbed acaryas. One who is disturbed by the
whirlpool movements of the material energy is not qualified to become an acarya.”(Sri Isopanisad, Mantra 13, Purport) Such shallow persons are unable
to appreciate that Lord Krishna has been worshiped as the Supreme Personality
of Godheadfor thousands of years by the most intelligent and highly qualified
people who ever lived in this world. For example, Srila Vyasadeva, Sri Sukadeva
Goswami, Sri Madhvacarya, Sri Alavandar, Srila Ramanujacarya, Bilvamangala
Thakura, Emperor Kulashekara, King Prataparudra, Emperor Krishnadeva Raya,
Ramananda Raya, Sri Caitanya Mahaprabhu, the Six Gosvamis of Vrindaban, Srila Bhaktivinoda
Thakura, Srila Bhaktisiddhanta Sarasvati and Srila Prabhupada have all accepted
Krishna as the Supreme Absolute Truth, as have innumerable other great persons
throughout history. Yet according to many deluded,modern-day Hindu leaders, the
hundreds of millions of Krishna bhaktas
throughoutthe past 5,000 years, and prior, werenaïve fools.
In fact,the pseudo-humanitarian
politicians and Godless Hindu scholars arethe fools. They have tried to exploit
Krishna’s words and fame for mundane social and political causes while
simultaneously claiming Krishna isa myth. Secular party politics and atheistic
systems of education havedone the worst violence to millions of innocent Indian
people by indoctrinating them with a sectarian socio-political consciousness
imported from the West. This type of indoctrination leads to disastrous, bloody
conflicts or full-scale war. Godless social ideals of secularism and party
politics aim to repressthe natural, native-born Krishna consciousness of all
Indian people. Avajananti mam mudha,
manusimtanumasrita. (Bg. 9.11)
Another type of miscreantunderstandsthat
Krishna was a genuine historical personality, yet they think He was an ordinary
king who died by an accidental wound to the foot. This brand of ignorant person
fails to consider that according to all historical accounts, Krishna easily
defeated the greatest warriors and theirpowerful weapons and armies. Even as a
child He easily killed the most powerful mystic demons. So how was it possible
that Hecould be killed by ahunter’s single small arrow in His foot?Bad luck?Yet
this misleading story of a hunter shooting Krishna’s lotus foot is there in sastras. Why? Srila Prabhupada explains
that one reason is to give envious persons facility to go to hell. Krishna thus
fulfills the desires of those who would rather be pilgrims to hell than
pilgrims to Vaikuntha.“If a living being
wants to go to hell, the Lord allows him to do so without interference…”Na mam duskritinomudhah,
prapadyantenaradhamah.(Bg. 7.15)
Lord Krishna’s brother and first
expansion, SriBalaramaji, who always worships Krishna as His superior,
disappeared in a much different way--one more in line with what one would
expect of an avatar of Godhead. He was seen mounting a huge, multi-headed,effulgent
serpent and flying off into outer space. Dull-minded persons who never hear
from proper authorities cannot understand why Krishna disappeared in an
apparently ordinary way and seemed to leave a material body behind. Similarly,
although Valmiki Rishi describedin Ramayana how Ravana kidnapped Mother Sita,
the liberated acaryas who know the
conclusions of all thesastrasknow
this incident was a pastime enacted under the Supreme Lord’s internal spiritual
potency. Lord Caitanya Himself discovered the passages in the Kurma Purana that explain that Ravana
kidnapped an illusory form of Mother
Sita. This is fully explained in Caitanya-Caritamrita.
Ravana could never capturethe all-spiritual Srimati Sita Devi, who is more
powerful than Durga Devi, her expansions and all demigods combined.
Srila Prabhupada’s translations
and purports give the final conclusions of all Vedic scriptures. In Srimad-Bhagavatam, he explains, “Persons who are addicted to the impersonal
feature of the Lord, whether in meditation or otherwise, are all pilgrims to
hell, because as stated in Bhagavad-gita(12.15),
impersonalists simply waste their time in mundane mental speculation because
they are addicted more to false arguments than reality.”(SB. 3.9.4) Such people who teach that
Krishna’s form is temporary or mundane, part of the illusory maya-shakti, will certainly go to hell. “Impersonalists who consider the
transcendental forms of the Lord to be products of the material world are
surely destined for hell.”He warns that their association is most dangerous
and condemned by Lord Brahma, because in truth the personal forms exhibited by
the Supreme Lord are meant for blessing everyone in all the universes. “Therefore the association of
impersonalists is condemned herewith by Lord Brahma.”Equally as toxic is
the association of Western indoctrinated pseudo-sadhus, pseudo-Hindu politicians and professors, and Indian Christians
and Muslims who teach that Krishna is a myth.It would be far better for those unwilling
to accept the authority of the authorized guru-parampara
to avoid speculating on the Absolute Truth and the Vedic scriptures. In this
way, they could avoid causing great harm to themselves and those who hear from
them.
So-called disciplesand others who
think Srila Prabhupada was an ordinary man are not intelligent. They have not
carefully understood Srila Prabhupada’s exalted character, unique qualities and
predicted activities and symptoms. They have obviously neglected a careful
study of his books.Such persons, and those who like to publish, distribute and read
their polluted memoirs,will likelysuffer serious reactions. For them, there maybe
hell to pay. PerhapsSrila Prabhupada will save them, or perhaps not. Srila Prabhupada
said one malicious ex-disciple would get another bona fide guru after ten
million lifetimes. “…gurusunara-matir… narakisah: One who considers that the
spiritual master is an ordinary human being… is considered a naraki, a candidate for hellish life.”(CC. Antya6.294,
Purport)
Materialistic devotees (prakrita-bhaktas) mightargue, “Srila Prabhupada himself said he was an
ordinary man, and he often presented himself in that way. Why would he mislead
us?”Srila Prabhupada answers, “That
is the teaching of Caitanya Mahaprabhu. Guru
more murkhadekhi. Caitanya Mahaprabhu is murkha? Why is it He’s posing Himself as that murkha?—‘I am fool number one.’ That means that is liberation. You
must always be ready to be chastised by the guru. Then one is liberated.” (Conv.
August 16, 1976, Bombay)Liberated saints, such asSrila Sanatana Gosvami and Srila
Raghunath Das Gosvami, although on the same level as Krishna Himself, oftenspeak
of themselves as being fallen and lowly.
Such statements are due to their feelings of transcendental ecstasy and
should never be taken literally. Liberatedacaryas show the proper mood that should
be cultivated in devotional service.Prakasananda Sarasvati, though an impersonalist
at the time of his first meeting with Sri Chaitanya Mahaprabhu, was not a dull
fellow or an offender. He never accepted that Lord Caitanya was a fool. In
spite of the Lord’s testing him with the statement: “guru more murkhadekhi,”Prakasananda
Sarasvatiunderstood that Lord Chaitanya was personallythe self-effulgent source
of the brahma-jyoti.Similarly,
sincere disciples are not misled by Srila Prabhupada’s examples of humility but
rather appreciate his unique, transcendental character and symptoms, which are
self-effulgent.
Persons who think Srila Prabhupada
was ignorant or deficient in any wayare, at best, foolish and dense. Those who
implythat he speculated about the future or lacked full command of English or
Sanskrit,or that he neglected to give important instructions,are certainly narakis, orcandidates for hellish life. Their
association may be as dangerous as the diehardimpersonalists, who Srila Prabhupada
said are “pilgrims to hell.”
As Good As Krishna Himself
Those who carefully read Srila Prabhupada’s
books and developfundamental faith learn that the supernatural perfections of
mystic yoga “constitute only an
insignificant part of the opulence of a pure devotee.”The eight-fold mystic
powers intensely sought by great rishis
and demigods, which are rarely achieved by anyone in full, are an insignificant
part of the power of a pure devotee --particularly one who acts as Lord Krishna’s
empowered representative (shakshadhari).
It is described in sastras that all
the powers of the demigods and great rishis,
as well as full liberation, which is high above all such powers, wait with folded
hands as maidservants of the pure devotee, who generally neglects them.
“Since one cannot visually experience the presence of the Supersoul, He
appears before us as a liberated devotee. Such a spiritual master is none other
than Krishna Himself.” (Caitanya-Caritamrta,Adi-lila
1.58)
“On the whole, the spiritual master is an agent of Krishna. Either he
is assistant to the gopis or
assistant to the cowherd boys. He is on the level of Krishna. That is the
verdict of all scriptures.” (Letter, Sept. 26, 1969)
“One should consider the spiritual master to be as good as the Supreme
Personality of Godhead. In spite of all of these instructions, if one considers
the spiritual master an ordinary human being, he is doomed. His study of the Vedas and his austerities and penances
for enlightenment are all useless, like the bathing of an elephant…”(SB. 7.15.26, Purport)
No comments:
Post a Comment